For example, Photos doesn’t offer an adjustment brush to selectively apply an edit to the image. And Photos’ editing features, while solid, don’t match Aperture’s. Photos also doesn’t support plug-ins or editing in an external editor-both key features of Aperture. And star ratings and color labels are imported as keywords. Photos doesn’t support the concept of separate projects inside a single library. And the differences certainly don’t end there. I’ve built an entire workflow around shooting Apple events: resizing the images to Web resolutions, applying a watermark, and saving the result out as JPEGs to be uploaded to a server.Ĭould I do that same task in Photos? It doesn’t support tethered shooting, exporting multiple versions with different image-quality levels, or watermarks. I use it mostly to capture images on the fly directly from my Canon DSLR. There are new features, to be sure, including modified and expanded editing tools and more direct integration with iCloud, but with a little time, iPhoto users should be able to settle in comfortably. But with the optional sidebar displayed in Photos, you’d think you were using a slick new version of iPhoto. Star ratings have been demoted to keyword status, flagged items are now Favorites, and iPhoto Events are now just another kind of photo album. Photos can import your iPhoto library (see Import from iPhoto into Photos) and retains most, but not all, of the features of iPhoto. If you’re used to iPhoto, Photos won’t be that jarring.
MAC IPHOTO VS PHOTOS TRIAL
You can download a free 30-day trial to give it a spin. It’s tightly integrated with Photoshop and available as part of Adobe’s Photography bundle, which as of this writing costs $120 per year, and offers cloud features of its own. If Photos doesn’t float your boat and you’re an Aperture user, you might consider Adobe’s Lightroom. Both apps will probably still work for a while yet, but updates are extremely unlikely. Not to be a negative nelly, but you shouldn’t hold out hope that Apple will reconsider its decision. The current maps are for people who never bother to get out of their cars.Apple’s announcement specified that iPhoto and Aperture would both be updated for compatibility with OS X Yosemite, but that’s it. It is impossible to locate precisely any photo outside the cities or off the road. The maps would be perfect for a navigation system - they are showing roads and buildings, shopping centres, hotels, restaurants, but most of the geographical features are missing, no height profile. The map type Apple is currently using for Photos is not very suitable for geo referencing. This way I can quickly copy and paste the coordinates into the location field of the Info panel in Photos.Īnd write the name of the place into the caption field, so I can search for it. I created a text file "My Places" with the name, the latitude, and longitude of the places I am using most. In the first version the feature was completely missing. But at least we can now add locations to photos. Yes, the geocoding in Photos is still sadly lacking. The reason why I'm personally still on iPhoto is the excellent way you can specify a name for your location, as well as the location itself.
Or if iPhoto is getting too old (Apple aren't developing it any further). So if you're happy with iPhoto, I would recommend staying with iPhoto and make the transition when you're happy that Photos' features have caught up with iPhoto's. Once you start modifying your Library with the one app, the changes you make will not be accessible from the other. Now here's the problem: You will have to decide which app to use and then stick with it. Here are some suggestions for workarounds, and this is an excellent way to manage your libraries for iPhoto or Photos. The only way around this are Photo's Extensions that would allow makers of photo editors to provide their functionality as an add-on. You can specify your own external editor of choice in iPhoto in Photos, you're stuck with its (granted, quite good) internal capabilities. If you want less work when committing the photos to your archive, that's great if you want more control, not so good.Īlso, location info is easy to edit in iPhoto in Photos, not so. The Photos app now handles the Event groupings automatically, based on photo dates and geolocation info. Events and Albums are the paradigms that iPhoto used.
0 kommentar(er)
